COVID-19: Find information and support for business on our coronavirus page. If your business is based in Victoria, you can find information about business restrictions on Business Victoria’s website.
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) recently upheld a decision by the Commissioner of Taxation to reject an entity's Research and Development (R&D) Tax Concession claim because it could not substantiate the claimed expenditure.

Read the full report on Hadrian Fraval Nominees Pty Ltd and Commissioner of Taxation [2013] AATA 127 (12 March 2013)

Tribunal upholds ATO decision

The AAT found that the entity did not take reasonable care to account for the R&D expenditure it incurred in relation to materials, licence fees and consultancy services. 

The Commissioner sought repayments and imposed penalties at the rate of 25% on the entity for two income years they had claimed. This amounted to over $550,000 in repayments and penalties. In addition a claim for R&D offsets valued at $170,000 was denied.

What this means for you

Companies must maintain adequate records to substantiate the R&D activities claimed and the incurring of expenditure in relation to those activities.

The tribunal found that the inherent systematic, investigative or experimental nature of R&D activities calls for a detailed degree of record keeping – generally records kept for the purpose of capturing details of those activities.

For more information